← 返回
基于直流-直流等效模型的三相交流-交流电流型与电压型直流链路变换器控制动态特性比较研究
Comparative Evaluation of Control Dynamics of 3-Φ AC-AC Current DC-Link and Voltage DC-Link Converters Based on DC-DC Equivalent Models
| 作者 | Neha Nain · Yining Zhang · Johann W. Kolar · Jonas Huber |
| 期刊 | IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics |
| 出版日期 | 2025年5月 |
| 技术分类 | 电动汽车驱动 |
| 技术标签 | DC-DC变换器 GaN器件 |
| 相关度评分 | ★★★★★ 5.0 / 5.0 |
| 关键词 | 变速驱动器 电压源转换器 电流源转换器 直流 - 直流等效电路 控制性能 |
语言:
中文摘要
采用电压型直流链路(VSC)或电流型直流链路(CSC)可实现电网供电的变频驱动系统,后者因单片集成GaN双向功率晶体管(M-BDS)的发展而重获关注。本文针对同等容量、输出正弦电压的交流-交流VSC与CSC系统,建立精确描述其动态特性的等效直流-直流模型,便于控制系统的设计与分析。实验结果表明,所构建的等效电路能准确预测开环与闭环行为。基于此模型对比二者的小信号与大信号电压控制性能,发现CSC在小信号带宽方面具有优势(72 kHz开关频率下5 kHz vs. 1.8 kHz),并揭示其控制动态与效率间的权衡关系。案例研究表明,CSC在不同电容设计下的大信号响应表现各异。
English Abstract
Variable speed drives (VSDs) operating from the mains can be realized either with a voltage dc-link (voltage-source converter, VSC) or, alternatively, with a current dc-link (current-source converter, CSC), which has received renewed interest recently due to the availability of monolithic bidirectional GaN power transistors (M-BDS). Considering equally rated ac-ac VSC and CSC systems with sinusoidal output voltages (additional LC filter for the VSC, inherently present filter capacitors for the CSC), this paper first derives equivalent dc-dc converter models that accurately capture the dynamic behavior of the ac-ac converters and thus advantageously allow for a straightforward design and analysis of the converter control systems. Detailed experimental results obtained with realized ac-ac VSC and CSC prototypes (1.4 kW, 200V line-to-line rms, 600V GaN monolithic bidirectional power transistors in the CSC) show very close matching of the open-loop and the closed-loop behavior with that predicted by the dc-dc equivalent circuits. Therefore, these circuits are then utilized to compare the small-signal and large-signal output voltage control performance of the VSC and the CSC, indicating certain advantages for the CSC regarding small-signal bandwidth (5 kHz vs. 1.8 kHz for 72 kHz switching frequency, identical for both systems) and, in case of the CSC, highlighting the trade-off between control dynamics (dc-link current kept at the nominal value) and efficiency (dc-link current adapted to the load). Finally, a case study considering the time until nominal current is reached in an exemplary motor at standstill finds mixed comparative large-signal performance of VSC and CSC; a CSC variant with the output capacitor selected for equal high-frequency ripple as the VSC is slower than the VSC (by around 45% for the considered converter’s specifications) whereas a CSC variant with the output capacitor selected for equal fundamental-frequency reactive power consumption as the VSC is faster (by around 40% for the considered converter’s specifications).
S
SunView 深度解读
该研究对阳光电源车载OBC充电机和电机驱动产品线具有重要参考价值。文章揭示的CSC拓扑在小信号带宽方面的显著优势(5kHz vs 1.8kHz),可直接应用于新能源汽车双向充电系统设计,提升动态响应速度。所建立的DC-DC等效模型为阳光电源开发基于GaN器件的高频电流型变换器提供了精确的控制设计方法。特别是CSC在72kHz开关频率下的控制动态与效率权衡分析,可指导ST储能变流器和充电桩产品在GaN器件应用中优化控制参数配置,在保证快速响应的同时兼顾系统效率,推动阳光电源在电动汽车驱动和双向充电领域的技术创新。