← 返回
储能系统技术 微电网 ★ 5.0

可再生微电网的4E性能评估:面向近零能耗建筑的氢储能与电池储能对比

4E performance evaluation of renewable microgrids: Comparing hydrogen and battery storage for nearly net zero energy buildings

语言:

中文摘要

可再生微电网与分布式发电近年来已成为为独立运行的近零能耗建筑供电的可持续解决方案。本研究提出了两种基于光伏的微电网系统:一种采用氢储能,另一种采用电池储能,用于满足某科研办公楼内电器、供暖、制冷及热水的实际用电需求。两个系统的平准化度电成本均设计为0.78欧元/千瓦时。通过TRNSYS 18软件结合动态功率负荷跟随模型进行仿真,并在运行第一年内基于能量、㶲、经济和环境(4E)准则对系统性能进行了综合评价。氢基系统包括一个13.1千瓦峰值的光伏阵列、一台7千瓦的碱性电解槽和一台3.5千瓦的燃料电池;而电池基系统则配备了一套150千瓦时的铅酸蓄电池。氢基系统实现了电力需求的完全满足,负荷损失概率为0%,并通过燃料电池余热回收提供热水;相比之下,电池基系统的负荷损失概率为4.34%。两个系统具有相近的整体能源效率,但㶲效率略有差异:前者分别为12.37%和14.33%,后者分别为12.28%和20.8%。尽管电池基系统的弃电率更高,但其往返效率达到90.23%,显著高于氢基系统的46.86%。两种配置每年均可避免约8.5吨二氧化碳当量的温室气体排放。因此,这两种系统均可被视为清洁电力生产的可持续替代方案,在显著减少碳足迹方面具有重要贡献。

English Abstract

Abstract Renewable microgrids and decentralized power generation have recently emerged as sustainable solutions for powering standalone nearly-net-zero buildings. This study proposed two photovoltaic-based microgrids: one with hydrogen energy storage and the other with battery energy storage, to supply the real-time energy needs for electrical appliances, heating, cooling, and hot water at a research office. Both systems are designed to achieve a levelized cost of energy of 0.78 EUR/kWh. Simulated using TRNSYS 18 software with a dynamic power load following model, the systems have been evaluated based on Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Environmental (4E) criteria over the first year of operation. The hydrogen-based system comprises a 13.1-kWp photovoltaic array, a 7-kW alkaline electrolyzer, and a 3.5-kW fuel cell. In contrast, the battery-based system includes a 150-kWh lead-acid battery. The hydrogen-based system fully meets the electrical demand with a loss of load probability of 0% and provides hot water through waste heat recovery from the fuel cell. The battery-based system, however, results in a loss of load probability of 4.34%. Both systems exhibit similar overall energy efficiencies but slightly different exergy efficiencies. The first system achieves 12.37% and 14.33%, respectively, while the second system achieves 12.28% and 20.8%. Despite the battery-based system having a higher energy dump, it boasts a greater round-trip efficiency of 90.23% compared to 46.86% for the hydrogen-based one. Both configurations avoid annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 8.5 tCO 2 eq. Therefore, they can be considered sustainable alternatives for cleaner energy production, significantly contributing to carbon footprint minimization.
S

SunView 深度解读

该研究对比氢储能与电池储能微网系统,对阳光电源ST系列储能变流器和PowerTitan系统具有重要参考价值。研究显示电池系统往返效率达90.23%,远超氢系统的46.86%,验证了阳光电源液冷储能技术路线的经济性优势。建议结合iSolarCloud平台优化动态负载跟随策略,提升失负荷概率表现;同时可探索PCS与热泵系统集成,实现类似燃料电池余热回收的综合能效提升,强化近零能耗建筑解决方案竞争力。