← 返回
基于分时电价策略的住宅建筑光伏与钒氧化还原液流电池系统设计与技术评估
Design and technical assessment of photovoltaic and vanadium redox flow battery systems for residential buildings based on time-of-use electricity pricing strategy
| 作者 | Haida Tang · Kaiwen Shi · Yuqin Wang · Haibin Yang · Wei Wan · Yong Hao Suab · Chunying Liab |
| 期刊 | Energy Conversion and Management |
| 出版日期 | 2025年1月 |
| 卷/期 | 第 341 卷 |
| 技术分类 | 光伏发电技术 |
| 技术标签 | 储能系统 户用光伏 |
| 相关度评分 | ★★★★★ 5.0 / 5.0 |
| 关键词 | A residential photovoltaic–vanadium redox [flow battery](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/flow-battery "Learn more about flow battery from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages") system with demand response. |
语言:
中文摘要
摘要 本研究探讨了光伏与钒氧化还原液流电池(PV-VRFB)系统在城市环境中为住宅供电的技术可行性。采用COMSOL建立了VRFB单元的三维瞬态模型,以分析不同电流密度下电池的性能表现。VRFB单元的仿真结果与实验数据吻合良好,电压相对误差仅为1.34%。研究聚焦于深圳一个典型的住宅社区,采用分时电价作为能源管理策略。仿真结果表明,VRFB的电流密度对充放电时间、效率以及储能和输出能量具有显著影响。在电流密度为40 A/m²时,VRFB的库仑效率、电压效率和能量效率分别为93.18%、84.77%和78.99%。较高的电流密度会不利地影响整个系统的能量性能。当VRFB电流密度从40 A/m²增加至60 A/m²时,光伏自用率(PRSR)下降2.19%,负荷覆盖率(LCR)下降2.30%。PV-VRFB系统实现了年平均59.40%的光伏自用率和62.08%的负荷覆盖率。与仅使用光伏系统(PV-Only)相比,PSCR和LCR分别提高了18.07%和14.18%。研究结果表明,在当前系统配置下,平准化度电成本(LCOE)为0.7416元/kWh,动态投资回收期(DPP)为22.65年。在住宅区域引入PV-VRFB系统可显著提升可再生能源的利用率,同时突显了控制VRFB电流密度的关键重要性。
English Abstract
Abstract This study investigated the technical feasibility of a photovoltaic and vanadium redox flow battery (PV-VRFB) system for residential power supply in urban environments. A three-dimensional transient model of the VRFB unit was established using COMSOL to analyze battery performance under different current densities. The VRFB unit simulation demonstrated good agreement with experimental results, showing a relative voltage error of 1.34 %. The research focused on a typical residential community in Shenzhen, utilizing time-of-use electricity pricing as an energy management strategy. The simulation results indicated that the current density of VRFB had a significant impact on charge–discharge time, efficiency, as well as the stored and output energy. At a current density of 40 A/m 2 , the coulombic efficiency, voltage efficiency, and energy efficiency of the VRFB were 93.18 %, 84.77 %, and 78.99 %, respectively. Higher current densities adversely affected overall system energy performance. An increase in VRFB current density from 40 A/m 2 to 60 A/m 2 resulted in decreases of 2.19 % in PV self-consumption rate (PRSR) and 2.30 % in load coverage rate (LCR). The PV-VRFB system achieved annual average PV self-consumption rate and load coverage rate values of 59.40 % and 62.08 %, respectively. The PSCR and LCR values were improved by 18.07 % and 14.18 % compared to the PV-Only system. The research results show that, in the current system, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is 0.7416 CNY/kWh and the dynamic payback period (DPP) is 22.65 years. Introducing a PV-VRFB system in residential areas significantly enhances renewable energy utilization, while highlighting the critical importance of controlling the VRFB current density.
S
SunView 深度解读
该PV-VRFB住宅储能研究对阳光电源ST系列储能变流器与SG户用逆变器集成方案具有重要参考价值。研究揭示电流密度对储能效率的关键影响,可指导我们优化PCS充放电策略:在分时电价场景下,通过iSolarCloud平台智能调控充放电功率,平衡系统效率与经济性。虽然钒液流电池成本较高,但其长循环寿命特性与我们PowerTitan液冷储能系统的设计理念契合。研究中59.40%光伏自发自用率和62.08%负荷覆盖率数据,可作为户用光储系统容量配比优化的基准,助力降低LCOE并缩短投资回收期。