← 返回
基于模型的高技术成熟度氨储能方案评估
Model-based evaluation of ammonia energy storage concepts at high technological readiness level
| 作者 | Simone Mucci · Marc-Daniel Stumm · Michael J.Rix · Alexander Mitsos |
| 期刊 | Applied Energy |
| 出版日期 | 2025年1月 |
| 卷/期 | 第 377 卷 |
| 技术分类 | 储能系统技术 |
| 技术标签 | 储能系统 |
| 相关度评分 | ★★★★★ 5.0 / 5.0 |
| 关键词 | Modeled three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus. |
语言:
中文摘要
摘要 氨是一种有前景的无碳能源载体,因其可在温和条件下以液态储存,且由氢气和氮气生产氨的工艺已建立并具有较高效率。文献中已提出多种氨制电(Ammonia-to-Power)方案,其中许多采用了尚未成熟的电化学技术。本文在Aspen Plus软件中对三种氨储能方案的充能与放能阶段进行建模,旨在在高效性与技术成熟度之间寻求平衡。在充能阶段,所有考虑的方案均通过哈伯-博世(Haber–Bosch)工艺利用低温水电解产生的氢气合成氨。在放能阶段,建模了三种不同的氨转化过程:(i)利用储热提供的热能将氨热分解为氮气和氢气,并将氢气送入燃料电池发电;(ii)利用部分氨流股燃烧产生的热量驱动氨的热分解,生成的氢气供给燃料电池发电;(iii)直接将氨作为燃料用于联合循环发电系统。本文从往返效率和平均化度电成本两个方面对这三种方案进行比较。所建模方案的往返效率约为30–34%,平均化度电成本为0.28–0.31 €/kWh(假设购电价格为0.03 €/kWh)。方案(i)同时具有最高的往返效率和最低的平均化度电成本。本文还通过㶲分析识别了各过程中的关键瓶颈环节。
English Abstract
Abstract Ammonia is a promising carbon-free energy carrier since it can be stored as a liquid at mild conditions and its production process from hydrogen and nitrogen is established and efficient. Several Ammonia-to-Power concepts have been proposed in the literature, many of which employ not-yet-mature electrochemical technologies. We model the charging and discharging phases of three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus seeking a compromise between efficient concepts and mature technologies. In the charging phase, ammonia is produced via the Haber–Bosch process using hydrogen from low-temperature water electrolysis for all the considered concepts. For the discharging phase, three ammonia conversion processes are modeled: (i) ammonia is thermally decomposed into nitrogen and hydrogen by using thermal energy from storage, and hydrogen is converted into electricity in a fuel cell; (ii) ammonia is thermally decomposed by using heat generated through the combustion of a fraction of the ammonia stream, and the produced hydrogen is supplied to a fuel cell; (iii) ammonia is used as a fuel in a combined power cycle. We compare these concepts with respect to roundtrip efficiency and levelized cost of electricity. The roundtrip efficiency and the levelized cost of electricity of the modeled concepts are ca. 30–34 % and 0.28–0.31 €kWh − 1 (for an electricity purchase price of 0.03 €kWh − 1 ). Concept (i) has both the highest roundtrip efficiency and the lowest levelized cost of electricity. We identify the process bottlenecks via an exergy analysis.
S
SunView 深度解读
该氨储能技术为阳光电源长时储能方案提供新思路。研究显示氨储能往返效率30-34%,适合季节性储能场景,可与现有ST系列PCS形成互补。充电阶段的低温电解制氢环节可结合SG系列光伏逆变器实现绿氢生产,放电阶段的燃料电池技术与公司电力电子变换器技术协同。建议关注氨-氢-电转换路径的能量管理策略,将火用分析方法应用于PowerTitan系统优化,探索化学储能与电化学储能的混合调度算法,拓展iSolarCloud平台对多元储能形式的智能运维能力。