← 返回
大型光伏电站结合电池储能系统在电力与辅助服务市场中运行的技术经济评估
Techno-economical assessment of battery storage combined with large-scale Photovoltaic power plants operating on energy and Ancillary Service Markets
| 作者 | Mohamad Koubar · Oskar Lindberg · David Lingfors · Pei Huang · Magnus Berg · Joakim Munkhammar |
| 期刊 | Applied Energy |
| 出版日期 | 2025年1月 |
| 卷/期 | 第 382 卷 |
| 技术分类 | 储能系统技术 |
| 技术标签 | 储能系统 地面光伏电站 |
| 相关度评分 | ★★★★★ 5.0 / 5.0 |
| 关键词 | Utilized PV data historical market prices and frequency data for BESS feasibility. |
语言:
中文摘要
摘要 确定电池储能系统(Battery Energy Storage System, BESS)应提供哪些特定服务以实现利润最大化是一项重大挑战。本研究采用技术经济分析框架,探讨了公用规模太阳能光伏发电(PV)电站结合BESS在不同市场中的最优盈利模式及其最佳容量配置。研究目标是在瑞典和德国的电力市场与频率调节市场(重点关注日前市场和一次调频市场)中实现收益最大化。模型输入数据包括历史市场价格、频率数据以及实际测量的光伏发电功率数据。结果表明,在现有光伏电站基础上增加BESS,并不会比独立部署BESS具有更短的投资回收期。然而,在2023年期间,瑞典与德国之间的投资回收期存在显著差异,分别为1.8年和6.8年,这主要归因于德国的频率调节市场价格低于瑞典。技术性能结果显示,在运行10年后,德国场景下BESS的能量容量保持率约为83%,而瑞典则约为87%。此外,将BESS同时参与一次调频和日前市场运行的策略显示,德国的投资回收期为6年,但能量容量衰减略有增加(从83%降至80%)。进一步对多种光伏-BESS容量组合的分析表明,德国在经济性和技术性指标方面存在差异,最优情况下可实现6年的投资回收期。敏感性分析考察了未来频率控制价格相对于2023年水平下降的情景(德国下降20%,瑞典下降50%),结果显示两国的投资回收期均延长约1年。
English Abstract
Abstract A significant challenge is to determine the specific services Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) should provide to maximize profits. This study investigates the most profitable markets and sizes of BESS with utility-scale solar Photovoltaics (PV) power plants using techno-economic analysis frameworks. The objective is to maximize profitability in energy and frequency markets, focusing on primary regulation and day-ahead markets for Sweden and Germany. The inputs are historical market prices and frequency data, as well as real measurement PV power data. The results show that adding a BESS to an existing PV park does not result in a lower payback period than if implementing a stand-alone BESS. However, the payback period differs between Sweden and Germany during 2023, i.e., being 1.8 and 6.8 years, respectively. This is explained by the lower frequency market prices for Germany compared to Sweden. The technical results indicate that the BESS energy capacity after 10 years of operation is approximately 83% for Germany, whereas, for Sweden, it is around 87%. Also, combining the operating of BESS on primary regulation and day-ahead markets showed a 6-year payback period with a slight increase in loss of energy capacity (from 83 to 80%) for Germany. Moreover, combining various PV-BESS sizes showed a discrepancy in economic and technical metrics for the BESS in Germany, resulting in a best-case of a 6-year payback period. A sensitivity analysis, which examines a drop in the frequency control prices in the future relative to 2023 (by 20% and 50% for Germany and Sweden, respectively), reveals an increase in the payback period for both countries by approximately 1 year.
S
SunView 深度解读
该研究验证了光储融合系统的商业价值,对阳光电源ST系列储能变流器与SG光伏逆变器的协同优化具有重要参考意义。研究显示储能参与一次调频市场可实现6年回收期,这为PowerTitan系统在欧洲市场的调频策略提供数据支撑。建议结合iSolarCloud平台开发多市场联合竞价算法,通过GFM控制技术提升调频响应速度,并针对德国市场优化日前+调频双市场运营模式,延长电池容量至10年保持80%以上,增强光储一体化解决方案的市场竞争力。