← 返回
储能系统技术 ★ 5.0

核电厂集成潜热储能系统的经济可行性分析

Economic feasibility analysis of LHTES integration with a nuclear power plant

作者 R.Deepak Selvakumar · Abdulrahman H.Mohamm · Siyuan Dai · Yulong Ding · Ahmed K.Alkaabi
期刊 Applied Energy
出版日期 2025年1月
卷/期 第 392 卷
技术分类 储能系统技术
相关度评分 ★★★★★ 5.0 / 5.0
关键词 Economic feasibility of thermal storage with nuclear plant is investigated.
语言:

中文摘要

将潜热储能(LHTES)系统集成到核电厂(NPPs)中是一种提高运行效率并实现负荷均衡的有前景的方法。本研究对LHTES单元与APR1400反应堆的集成进行了综合的技术经济分析。采用ε-NTU法估算LHTES单元的设计参数和性能表现。针对集成发电循环,考虑25年的生命周期,估算了其资本支出和运行费用。假设电价年增长率为4.83%,分别估算了峰时和非峰时电价情景下的年收入。通过改变相变材料(PCM)的成本进行净现值(NPV)分析,以确定盈利的临界阈值。基于NPV结果计算了投资回收期,结果显示在所有PCM成本条件下,峰时电价情景均可实现盈利。内部收益率(IRR)计算进一步揭示了系统超越盈利阈值所需满足的条件。盈亏平衡分析识别出关键的电价增长率阈值和PCM成本上限,表明当峰时电价的增长率超过3.12%、非峰时电价的增长率超过8.18%时,项目可实现盈利。基于蒙特卡洛(MC)方法的概率分析显示,在峰时电价情景下盈利的概率高达99.75%。电价增长率和折现率是具有较高归一化敏感性指数的关键参数。最后,二维NPV图展示了电价增长率与折现率的联合影响,为决策者提供了可操作的洞察。经济评估结果表明,在峰时电价条件下,当PCM成本分别为0.6、2.3和4.0美元/千克时,LHTES系统的投资回收期分别为2.71年、3.66年和5.09年;至2050年的相应净现值分别为13269万美元、6867万美元和428万美元,内部收益率(IRR)分别为13.28%、10.24%和7.20%。这三种情况的效益成本比均大于1,证实了项目的盈利能力。相反,在非峰时电价情景下,所有配置均无法在25年项目生命周期内实现投资回收,且全部产生负净现值和负内部收益率,效益成本比介于0.577至0.823之间。本研究通过对LHTES系统与核电发电集成的全面技术经济分析,明确了驱动盈利性的关键参数,并深化了对在核电厂中集成LHTES系统经济可行性的理解。

English Abstract

Abstract Integrating latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems into nuclear power plants (NPPs) is a promising approach to improve operational efficiency and ensure load leveling. This study presents a combined techno-economic analysis of LHTES unit integration with the APR1400 reactor. ε -NTU method is used to estimate the design parameters and the performance of the LHTES unit. Capital and operational expenses are estimated for the integrated power generation cycle, considering a life cycle of 25 years. Assuming a 4.83 % annual growth rate in tariffs, annual revenue generated under peak and off-peak tariff scenarios are estimated. Net present value (NPV) analysis is performed for varying phase change material (PCM) costs to determine the profitability thresholds. Based on the NPV results, payback periods are calculated, revealing that profitability can be achieved with peak tariff scenarios at all PCM costs. Internal rate of return (IRR) calculations further demonstrate the conditions under which the system can exceed profitability thresholds. A break-even analysis identifies critical tariff growth rates and PCM cost limits, indicating that the project becomes profitable when the tariff growth rate is above 3.12 % for peak tariffs and 8.18 % for off-peak tariffs. A Monte Carlo (MC) method-based probability analysis shows that the probability of profit is 99.75 % for the peak tariff scenario. Tariff growth and discount rates are the key parameters with high normalized sensitivity indices. Finally, 2D NPV maps demonstrate the combined impact of tariff growth rate and discount rate, providing actionable insights for decision-makers. The economic evaluation reveals that the LHTES system achieves a payback period of 2.71, 3.66, and 5.09 years for PCM costs of 0.6, 2.3, and 4.0 USD/kg, respectively, under peak tariff conditions. The corresponding NPVs by 2050 are 132.69, 68.67, and 4.28 million USD, with internal rates of return (IRR) of 13.28 %, 10.24 %, and 7.20 %. All three cases exhibit benefit-to-cost ratios exceeding unity, confirming profitability. Conversely, under off-peak tariff scenarios, none of the configurations achieve payback within the 25-year project life, and all result in negative NPVs and IRRs, with benefit-to-cost ratios ranging from 0.577 to 0.823. The comprehensive techno-economic analysis of LHTES integration with nuclear power generation highlights the key parameters that drive profitability. Deeper insights are obtained into the economic feasibility of integrating LHTES systems in nuclear power plants.
S

SunView 深度解读

该核电站潜热储能(LHTES)技术对阳光电源储能系统具有重要借鉴价值。研究验证了储能系统在电价峰谷套利场景下的经济可行性,峰电价情景下2.71-5.09年即可回收成本,NPV达132.69百万美元,IRR超13%。这为ST系列PCS和PowerTitan储能系统在电网调峰应用提供了商业模式参考。蒙特卡洛分析显示峰电价场景盈利概率达99.75%,印证了阳光电源储能产品在峰谷价差套利、辅助服务市场的盈利潜力。研究中的ε-NTU热交换设计方法可启发液冷储能系统的热管理优化,敏感性分析方法可应用于iSolarCloud平台的储能项目经济性评估模块开发。